Saturday, March 31, 2018

32 Response to Predator Inquiry 2011.06.25 Re: Hit and Run Traffic Collision 06/19/2011

Re: Hit and Run Traffic Collision 2011.06.19

Sent by CHP
Jun 25, 2011 at 6:07 PM

Hello Sir,
On Sunday June 19, 2011 at approximately 05:45 pm, I was called out to a hit and run traffic collision on Agua Dulce Canyon Road, near Morgan Road.  After talking with witnesses, I was told you pulled over to the right shoulder and spoke with the driver of a black Toyota Tundra who had collided into the guardrail.  You then offered your assistance to the driver by giving him a ride to an unknown location, possibly to a near by store.  The questions I have are, Do you know the name of the driver you gave the ride too?  Can you provide me with a description of the driver?  Where did you take the driver and drop him off?  Did you actually witness the collision?  Was the driver sick or injured? 
Also, will you provide me with your full name, address and birth date.
Thank you 
Officer James Tansen 19658
Newhall CHP

Reply by Doc Ellis
Jun 26, 2011 at 3:45 PM

Hello Tansen.

Your comments in this font.  
Questionable description in this font  
My comments in this font. 

Hello Sir 
On Sunday June 19, 2011 at approximately 05:45 pm, I was called out to a hit and run traffic collision on Agua Dulce Canyon Road, near Morgan Road. 

After talking with witnesses, I was told you pulled over to the right shoulder and spoke with the driver of a black Toyota Tundra who had collided into the guardrail. So you talked to some folks and then somebody told you something. How do you know that somebody was correct in identifying the individual with whom he said that I spoke? How do you know that somebody told you truth? Did any of your witnesses see the collision? Did any witness see who got out of the vehicle?

You then offered your assistance to the driver by giving him a ride to an unknown location, possibly to a near by store.  The questions I have are, What evidence do you have that I offered assistance? How do you know that this individual was the driver of the vehicle?

Do you know the name of the driver you gave the ride too?  Not Applicable

Can you provide me with a description of the driver? Not Applicable

Where did you take the driver and drop him off?  Not Applicable

Did you actually witness the collision? No

Was the driver sick or injured?  Not Applicable

Also, will you provide me with your full name, address and birth date. No.

Thank you 
Officer James Tansen 19658
Newhall CHP

I have a right to remain silent. This means that I have a right to refuse to provide you with any information. You or some other person will use information that I provide to you against me. I have a right to legal representation at your expense if you assault me through the use of the law. My right to legal representation at your expense is a delegated right. This means that I have a right to defend myself if you assault me.

Given that anything I say will be used against me, even if it is an honest error or memory error, I will only discuss matters with you if you give me a written promise of blanket immunity for any and all testimony I might have to offer.

Doc Ellis

31 About a Retiring Predator

Scott is a 1% predator.

He behaved like a Boy Scout when asked to call AAA on behalf of a civilian. He persuaded the civilian to let him jump-start the civilian's vehicle. 99% of predators would escalate such a request into a violent encounter, claiming to be afraid for their safety.

He shines light on dark events involving cars and critters. 99% of predators will shoot somebody or some critter in such events.

He "Dads" an obnoxious inebriated guy into following him away from an event. 99% of predators would shoot or beat to death an obnoxious inebriated guy and claim that they feared for their lives.

I have never seen any report about Scott that he beat up a motorist during a traffic stop, arrested the guy, and then got a government agency to pay the guy off. 99% of predators would do that, and kill the guy just before he collected the payoff.

I am glad Scott is a 1% predator, and not a 99% predator. I am sorry that Scott is a predator at all.

Best wishes to Scott going forward from 2018.04.01.

I wrote this as a constituent to the ADTC. who represent everybody, not just cop-suckers...

ADTC folks who censor or remove contents by dissident ADTC constituents have forgotten that reality.

Wednesday, August 13, 2014

30 Yelp review of L M Towing

This is a Yelp review of L M Towing 22400 The Old Road, Newhall, CA

start review
I am not impressed.   

When I retrieved my 2004 Jeep Grand Cherokee from their yard the morning of 2014.08.09 Saturday, I noticed that the brake indicator light was on and that the brake activation was rather soft.  I noticed that the braking was very slow to take effect.   

I took the Jeep to a repair shop and the guy there found that I had very low brake fluid level. He added fluid to the top and the brake indicator light went off.  The braking was still not right.  I went home.

When I left home to go to work, I saw that the brake indicator light was on again.  I checked the brake fluid level and it was way down.  There was fluid leaking down from the rear brake line(s).  I replenished the brake fluid reservoir and went to work.  I saw fluid on the ground every place that I parked.

I had to hose down the rear of the Jeep when I got home because brake fluid splattered over the back door from dripping into the air stream below the fuel tank.

I determined that the rear brake line(s) leak because somebody improperly secured the vehicle when he towed it. I could see fresh dents on the fuel tank cover adjacent to the brake lines.  

I personally think that the guy who secured the Jeep onto his truck deliberately secured as he did as payback because he had so much trouble moving the Jeep from a parking spot and onto the flatbed.  The Jeep was locked.  The key was nowhere for him to find.  I still have not worked out how he opened the Jeep without a key.  I think he had a universal remote that let him bypass the locking mechanism.  

The Jeep was locked because cops were arresting me because I would not cooperate with them.  I think the guy figured that I am a jerk, and that the cops will back him up if I criticise his work, so he just went ahead and damaged the brake line(s).

The Jeep goes in for repair and when I get the Jeep back I expect to present the repair bill to this service for reimbursement.   We will see how that works out.  I don't expect these folks to make this right.

update 2014.08.11 Monday
I got the Jeep back from the repair shop.  The work order notes that the brake line was busted and leaking fluid.  The repair tech replaced the brake line and bled the system.  Total bill was $127.50.  Next, I get to find out if the folks at LM will reimburse me.....

questions or concerns about this review?  find me at

end review

29 Hostile Encounter 2014.08.08

In other news

I am home from an arrest for committing an act of civil disobedience, refusing to comply with a cop.    

I refused to cooperate with a chiparoo who then arrested me for "suspicion of engaging in a speed contest" 2014.08.08 Friday afternoon. I am out and have a court date 2014.08.14 Thursday 0830 at the Newhall courthouse. We will see how that works out....[see update 2014.08.13 Wednesday below]

I drove past a couple of vehicles on Davenport road and saw an alleged cop car pull out behind me.  I found a place to wait whilst the alleged cop car passed me.  But the guy Todd Cookston -14277- pulled up beside me whilst I was stationary beside the road and wanted to talk to me.  Davenport usually has very little traffic on it, and was almost deserted at that time.  Given that cops kill folks every 7 to 8 hours, and that there would be no witnesses to any encounter, I was concerned about my safety, I had no desire to interact with him, and I rudely told him to go away. He red-lit me and I would not cooperate, choosing to exercise my ability to self-defend by leaving (see John Bad Elk v. United States, 177 U.S. 529 (1900) at for the self-defence ruling) Cookston followed me along Davenport Road to Sierra Highway.  I came to a full stop at Sierra Highway and signaled for a left turn.

I turned left and Cookston followed me. Other folks, including Maurer - 19317, Mitchell - 19131, and Cisek - no number- , joined Cookston in following me.   I slowed down  to 25 mph in the school zone near Sand Canyon and drove the speed limit to Soledad Canyon Road in Canyon Country and came to a full stop due to the red light.  I signaled for a left turn and turned left when the signal was green.  I drove into the parking area in front of a liquor store where he arrested me.  I exited the Jeep whist video-recording the encounter, using a pink Polaroid digital camera. Somebody attacked me from behind my right shoulder and knocked me down.   Other folks joined in the take-down.

I demanded that Cookston show me his ID.  He refused. 

I told Cookston that he has to write down his questions and comments because I don’t hear well.  He moved his mouth and I could not understand what he was saying.

I demanded a lawyer.  Never got one.

No Miranda, either.

Donald Wilson-200790 tried to engage me in conversation using smiles to try to win me over that he was sympathetic to my situation.  I refused to answer his questions.  I asked him if he was another Manny Ramos or Jay Cincinelli looking for a Kelly Thomas piƱata of his own.  He pretended to not know what I was talking about. During this conversation, I demanded a lawyer.

Whilst Cookston drove me to the Sheriff Station in Newhall, he used his cell phone in violation of the vehicle code.

The camera is broken.  There is a very brief video clip that depicts behaviour at the west-bound left lane at the Sierra Highway and Soledad Canyon Road in Canyon Country intersection.  

During the booking, Wilson counted out seven 100 dollar bills out of ten 100 dollar bills. I think Wilson stole the other three 100 dollar bills.

Lori is righteously pissed at me because I got into this situation. You have my permission to be pissed at me, too.

I could have 
  • taken out my camera and started video-recording as soon as Cookston tried to talk to me.  
  • rolled up the Jeep windows and refused to respond to him.  
  • demanded to see his cop ID as soon as he asked for my ID.  
  • put hazard lights on and  driven to the courthouse in Newhall and demanded that all cops interacting with me show cop ID.

Update 2014.08.13 Wednesday
Lori reviewed paperwork related to this encounter and saw a reference to a court appearance 0830 2014.08.11 Monday.  She got me at a client work site and we went right over to court.  

But the criminal court clerk could not find a case or warrant for Monday and sent us to the District Attorney clerks who could not find a case or warrant, either....Turns out that I have a 0830 2014.10.14 Tuesday court date, not 0830 2014.08.11 Monday, or 0830 2014.08.14 Thursday.  

I get that Cookston et al are playing paperwork games....

update 2015.04.06 
We attended a 1538.5 hearing 2015.04.06 Monday am and left with an apparent dismissal. 

The hearing was to address a motion to suppress the prosecutor's evidence because the cop acted unlawfully from the time he lit me up to the arrest and beyond. The judge, prosecutor, testilier, defence counsel, and I watched a video of the incident. The judge ruled that I was rude, that the fact that I was being rude did not authorise the cop to detain me, that the participating officers acted unlawfully, and that the evidence that they provided was therefore invalid. 

The prosecutor then moved to dismiss because he had no valid evidence to prove the charge. 

We got documentation that the judge dismissed the charge 2015.04.08 Wednesday pm.

Do you realise that I actually manipulated a-half-dozen guys into unlawfully following me for no reason? I got two judges, one commissioner, at least four DDAs, two PDs, three court reporters (one a CART), two court clerks, and sundry other folks in an arraignment, five pre-trial hearings, and a suppression motion hearing in two courtrooms..... 

all at government expense.... 

I did good! 

and this was for a rinky-dinky misdemeanor....
This means that the folks at L&M were assisting cops in an illegal and unlawful event.

This may mean that the L&M folks wrongfully impounded my vehicle.  See this

The guy at the repair shop covered the asses of the L&M folks by throwing the brake line away instead of saving it for me. So the only evidence that I have is the invoices for the repair and for brake fluid.

L&M could reimburse me $127.50 for the repair bill, and $20.00 for the brake fluid.

28 Six Boys Thirteen Hands Propaganda.3.18.2009

This refers to: 

This is a lovely well written bit of pro-State propaganda, by Michael Powell, at around 2000, or so.

I checked Snopes at

I found this story at Truth or Fiction:

Both accounts that I saw included the observation that the last few paragraphs of this piece were included after Powell wrote it. A photographer, Joe Rosenthal, reportedly photographed the second raising of a Flag on a mountain five days into a thirty-five day battle. This picture lead to the sculpting of the USMC War Memorial idolized in “Six Boys”. The “Flag” picture was actually a propaganda effort. See here: for information on the battle, here for the taking of the “Flag” picture and here for the making of the statue:

“Six Boys and Thirteen Hands”(Six Boys) is corrupt.

The underlying premise to this piece is that your life belongs to someone else, that you have an obligation to serve nonentities called by such names as “faith,” “family,” or “fatherland”. You don’t need someone to fight on your behalf at everyone’s expense. You can defend yourself. You can delegate your defense at your expense to a willing agent. You have the right to decide whether to use lethal or non-lethal reaction to aggressive action directed against you. You do not have the right to inflict collateral damage, that is, casualties on noncombatants. You owe nothing to a metaphysical nonentity. Nor do you owe a duty to someone or something, just because you are alive.

What is freedom for which so many “lay down their lives?” Here is a definition of freedom: · "Freedom in its most elemental state is the power to withdraw one's consent when the State-or anyone else-lays an improper claim to one's life or property." -Will Grigg Reflections on Resurrection Sunday: We're Commanded to be Free ProLiberate 3.23.2008

In a Utopian world, our agendas would all be compatible. In the real world, we often have partially-or even totally- incompatible agendas. Some of us try to resolve differences through negotiation. Some of us use force, -or threaten to use force –to authorize us to seize what we want. Some of us support one or the other.

The core of this paean to sacrifice is that some 7,000 men died to secure an island of negligible value in the name of securing the freedoms of “the People,” residents of a nation-state. And this inconsequential event was promoted as a monumental battle for the greater good of the citizens of a nation-state. Many folks saw the flag raising as the climax of the Iwo Jima battle, when in fact, it was just a stunt to elevate the morale of government employees and their family members and friends.

The most pernicious part of “Six Boys” is that there is really no point to Bradley’s remarks. It’s just a collection of words meant to make readers experience emotive reactions in support for government employees.

Sunday, February 24, 2013

27 Gunmen.2013.02.20

I was inside my work vehicle at 1600 on Wednesday 2013.02.20 in front of a corner-located client house right after I got done there taking care of two horses documenting my work when I realised that I was in danger of being shot as a collateral target.  These gunmen aimed their guns in my direction toward their targeted folks between the gunmen and me. 
 There were two horses in paddocks and two dogs in a fenced area adjacent to the client house on the property side of the client fence on the west-bound side of the road. There were at least two dogs behind the resident fence on the east-bound side of the road. There were least two dogs behind the resident fence on the property west of the client property. I was parked parallel to the client fence facing west.  I don’t know how many folks were in the houses across the street and west of the client house.
 I grabbed my camera and photographed these gunmen. I did not hide the fact that I was photographing these gunmen. Lori and I bought that pink Polaroid digital camera several years ago. It’s easy to see that it is a camera and not a gun...for now, anyway. The time-stamps are off by about an hour, set to PDT. The camera doesn't do long distance close-ups. I could have photographed the gunmen when I drove by them after they stood down.
 They ordered un-armed targets to exit the vehicle in which they were riding and assume the coup de gras position.

There were over a half-dozen tax-financed vehicles parked behind the targets' vehicle. West-bound drivers diverted to the south. East-bound drivers drove right through the fire-zone.  No way I was gonna start my vehicle up and drive away as long as these gunmen were pointing guns in my direction. 
 Once I saw that the gunmen were distracted from shooting at me, I left.  When I left, I just wanted to get to my next stop to care for more critters. I was not ready to engage these gunmen. If that makes me a coward, so be it.

I told my brother Rob when he was a kid to never point a gun at somebody unless you intend to kill 'em. Those gunmen intended to kill me. I was very lucky this time.

These pics are from the area where gunmen stood pointing their guns at collateral targets, including the Jeep. As you can see, lots of places for bullets to go...

For whatever reason, these gunmen refrained from executing their primary targets. 

For whatever reason, these gunmen refrained from executing collateral targets. 

That day was a good day to be a target, given that so many targets die. No targets died there, then.

Saturday, May 26, 2012

26 You Own You: The Prime Axiom

You own you: the prime axiom.
  • You (subject and object) means the reader.
  • Own (verb) means have the authority to use.
  • The (definite article) means specifically, or none other.
  • Prime (adjective) means the most important and/or the first in a series.
  • Axiom (noun) means a self evident statement that leads to other truths.

This essay is directed to you to make it personal. I want you to grasp that self-sovereignty applies to you. I want you to understand that your life is all about you, indeed. So, I direct these words to you.

This axiom applies to every human.  No other human has authority to violate your authority to act or not, and you have no authority to violate their authority to act or not.
The most important concept in liberty is that you are self-owned. You have self-generated authority to act, or not. You are responsible for your actions and for their consequences. You are the central actor in your life.